Disclosure: I worked for the Lamont campaign doing web design and production and some writing for the official blog (from 9/5/06 to 11/07/06).

Tuesday, June 13, 2006

 

Tuesday Round-Up


Comments:
Reid's consequences comment could just as easily be interpreted to mean that pro-Ned, anti-Joe activism will result in Joe's leaving the Party.

My guess is that that is what Reid meant and that he doesn't view a Lieberman defection as a positive development. Just a guess.
 
I agree that the quote as printed can be read a number of different ways, but Jane, who was in the room, seemed to be pretty certain of Reid's context and tone.

I don't think anyone in the Democratic party would view a Lieberman defection as "positive," and certainly not Reid, who would be forced to make some pretty difficult decisions.
 
wow, I see a lot of great new blog entries entered here in the last few days!

thanks!
 
Yep. You lay down with dogs and you get up with fleas.

Better reserve that Ryder truck, Joe, cuz you're going home. :-)
 
"It’s important for people to know that their actions have consequences."

I have now read jane's entire article, and I take this to mean that harry reid is saying that joe could bolt and turn indie because of the lamont challenge, but who knows -

hamsher however is interpreting this cryptic reid statement wrong.
 
Post a Comment



<< Home