Well it looks like Joe's got the right-wing male hooker vote sewn up:

Truth be told, JFK would recognize the Democratic Party because his BROTHER is a member of its radicalized leadership as is the "other JFK", whose cheap imitation of a war hero would be repugnant to the commander of PT-109. He'd more than likely be sickened by its treatment of Sen. Joe Lieberman, one of the few in his party who takes the threat of Islamofacism seriously.

Now, this is silly, and the wisdom of linking to a forgotten non-entity like Gannon/Guckert is certainly questionable (who knew he was still blogging?). But I do so only because there's a larger issue illustrated here.

I've spent a fair amount of time scouring the blogs on this race, and literally every single one of the (admittedly few) bloggers I've come across who are defending Lieberman are right-wingers who have barely a single bad word for him. I have yet to come across even one self-described liberal, Democratic, moderate, or even non-partisan blogger speaking up strongly for Lieberman. If anyone has come across one, please let me know. But I haven't.

Why is the right-wing blogosphere - who should have zero interest in a closed Democratic primary where they lack even a credible GOP challenger for the general - so eager to try to help Lieberman fend off Ned Lamont? The answer is clear: not only is he an ideological fellow traveller of those supporting the Cheney-Rumsfeld neoconservative foreign policy, but he's also the most useful of Fox News Democrats to for the GOP to have around, constantly undercutting the opposition and making it nearly impossible for Democrats to define themselves on any issue as a party.

Republicans of all stripes adore Joe for his continuing service to their party, and his continuing disservice to his own. Including, apparently, male prostitutes who used to frequent the White House on a daily basis.