Disclosure: I worked for the Lamont campaign doing web design and production and some writing for the official blog (from 9/5/06 to 11/07/06).
Friday, November 03, 2006
Joe on Imus: Threatens Dodd, Dumps on Dems
Hearing that Joe made a "Godfather" threat to Sen. Dodd on Imus this morning. Anyone have the audio/video? (Update and Bumped: Here's the quote:)
Apparently, Dodd was asked about this on MSNBC a few minutes ago. And he laughed it off. Well, it's that courageous attitude that is sure to get him elected president in 2008.
Crooks and Liars has some video of another comment - Joe demonstrating his commitment to Democratic ideals.
In a few short months, it's gone from being "how dare Ned Lamont question my Democratic credentials" to "the only reason I'm joining a party is to protect my seniority"
And Democrats and Republicans alike at Bloomberg's fundraiser last week thought it likely that Joe would caucus with Republicans if it suited him.
IMUS: "You said the next time you have a meal with Dodd, you'll have to bring a food taster."
LIEBERMAN: "Now I think I should bring Don Corleone."
Apparently, Dodd was asked about this on MSNBC a few minutes ago. And he laughed it off. Well, it's that courageous attitude that is sure to get him elected president in 2008.
Crooks and Liars has some video of another comment - Joe demonstrating his commitment to Democratic ideals.
"You gotta join one caucus or another to protect your seniority... but I'm going to be very independent... watch me..."
In a few short months, it's gone from being "how dare Ned Lamont question my Democratic credentials" to "the only reason I'm joining a party is to protect my seniority"
And Democrats and Republicans alike at Bloomberg's fundraiser last week thought it likely that Joe would caucus with Republicans if it suited him.
posted by tparty at 12:37 PM 
Comments:
<< Home
analyst, since you voted for him three times, just think of everything John Rowland became.
Now think of the opposite.
Your choice is John Rowland redux or Ned Lamont. Since you're not voting for Ned.
You're voting for John Rowland again.
Post a Comment
Now think of the opposite.
Your choice is John Rowland redux or Ned Lamont. Since you're not voting for Ned.
You're voting for John Rowland again.
<< Home