Disclosure: I worked for the Lamont campaign doing web design and production and some writing for the official blog (from 9/5/06 to 11/07/06).

Sunday, July 16, 2006

 

Sunday News Round-Up


Comments:
http://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/pittsburghtrib/news/mostread/s_461947.html
 
Ray Hackett has gone over the edge.
 
That Hackett rant is bizarre. He makes up for himself the idea that Lamont-supporting bloggers won't support the winner of the primary if it's Lieberman (not mentioning, of course, that Lamont himself has pledged to do so). He then spends half the column attacking them for it, without providing a shred of evidence that any, much less a majority of them, has refused to support Lieberman if he's the Democratic nominee.
 
Tparty, if you're giving Lamont's total contributions it would be good to have the total amount he's raised, as well as the total amount Lieberman has raised. As it is, there are only the 2-month numbers to compare the $2.5 million to, and it makes it look like Lieberman is right that Lamont is using his personal funds to outspend him.
 
kc- Updated the post.
 
More lieberman lawn signs are popping up in West hartford, at least. My fiancee and I have a stupid game we play where we say "Ned Lamont" every time we see a Lamont lawn sign. Until this past week, I only saw Lieberman lawn signs on Prospect up past Elizabeth Park (by the mansions up there). Let's just say that we can't go anywhere in West Hartford without saying Ned Lamont 4 or 5 times.

Thursday, I went for a bike ride around the neighborhood and saw the first clump of Lieberman signs. On that bike ride, Lieberman and Lamont were even. I realize it might be the neighborhood. I've heard that the area I bike through (basically on my way to Elizabeth Park or St. Josephs) tracks a bit more Republican, so it makes sense. This is the area north of Farmington between Quaker and Prospect. I live south of Farmington and my neighborhood is all Lamont...
 
Post a Comment



<< Home